Web Survey Bibliography
The authors explore the effect of a form of question context on responses to a computer-mediated marketing research survey. As an increasing proportion of marketing research is conducted through computer interfaces, the pool of potential context effects is rapidly expanding. The authors conduct an experiment using a multi-item scale that consists of five dimensions and manipulate three such context effects: explicit item labeling, item presentation (alonelgrouped), and subscale items presented contiguously or not. In a refined analysis of variance, the authors use a special one-dimensional case of the spatial and attribute-based distance metric proposed by Hoch, Bradlow, and Wansink (1999) to explain subscale variance, replacing the indicator variable for clustering used in a standard analysis of variance. This metric provides a scalar measure of how much variation exists in the order of presentation of items within a subscale (the subscale distance). This analysis indicates a significant decrease in subscale variance (increased reliability) with decreasing subscale distance but no-longer-significant effects due to labeling and grouping. The authors discuss implications of their findings for researchers conducting surveys in computer-mediated environments.
Homepage (Abstract)/ (Full text)
Web survey bibliography - Marketing/business (336)
- Validity of the SDS-17 measure of social desirability in the American context; 2006; Blake, B. F., Valdiserri, J., Neuendorf, K., Nemeth, J.
- Comparing the Generalizability of Online and Mail Surveys in Cross-National Service Quality Research; 2006; Deutskens, E., de Jong, K., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M.
- The professional respondent problem in online panel surveys today; 2005; Fulgoni, G.
- Workaround: Site’s surveys beat pop-up blockers, yield responses; 2005; Arnold, C.
- An assessment of measurement invariance between online and mail surveys ; 2005; Deutskens, E., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M.
- Web Versus Paper Questionnares: A Design and Functionality - Comparison; 2005; Jones, Ja., Fraser, C., Dowling, Z.
- An Empirical Evaluation of Three Web Survey Design Principles; 2005; Healey, B., Macpherson, T., Kuijten, B.
- In my opinion; 2005; Haley, F.
- Meta-Analyses on Contingent versus Unconditional Incentives; 2005; Goeritz, A.
- An experiment in call scheduling; 2004; Cunningham, P., Martin, D., Brick, J. M.
- Web Surveys for Electronic Commerce: A Review of the Literature; 2004; Huang, H.-M., Liaw, S. S.
- A Comparison of Objective Characteristics and User Perception of Web Sites; 2004; Lee, S.-J., Lee, W.-N., Kim, H., Stout, P. A.
- The Effect of Billboards within the Gaming Environment; 2004; Chaney, I. M., Lin, K.-H., Chaney, J.
- The impact of material incentives on response quantity, response quality, sample composition, survey...; 2004; Goeritz, A.
- Identifying and Reducing Response Burdens in Internet Business Surveys; 2004; Haraldsen, G.
- The Internet: Marketing Researcher's Panacea or Pandora's Box?; 2004; Gurney, P. M., Chambers, E., Grant, L., Shah, S., Sullivan, M. P.
- Developing automated e-survey and control tools: an application in industrial management; 2004; Scornavacca Jr., E., Becker, J. L., Barnes, S.
- Survey Mode Preferences of Business Respondents; 2004; Tarnai, J., Paxon, M. C.
- Cutting Market Research Costs with On-Site Surveys; 2004; Dysart, J.
- Web-based data collection; 2003; Tourangeau, R.
- Response order effects – how do people read?; 2003; Duffy, B.
- Internet Marketing Research: Recources and Techniques; 2003; Forrest, E.
- Are you talking to the right people?; 2003; Davis, H.
- Be prepared; 2003; Fitzgerald, A.
- Online sample -- can you trust it?; 2003; Maginnis, C.
- Internet surveys: limits and beyond limits; 2003; Mititelu, C.
- Web site design benchmarking within industry groups; 2003; Kim, S.-E., Shaw, T., Schneider, H.
- Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context; 2003; Park, C.-H., Kim, Y.-G.
- Web Survey's Hidden Hazards; 2003; Morrel Samuels, P.
- On-line qualitative market research: Interviewing the world at a fingertip; 2002; Scholl, N., Mulders, S., Drent, R.
- Trends in marketing research and their impact on survey research sampling; 2002; Anich, B.
- Predicting the future of consumer panels; 2002; Wansink, B., Sudman, S.
- From Paper-and-Pencil to Screen-and-Keyboard: An Empirical Assessment of Equivalence Issues in Internet...; 2002; Deutskens, E., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M.
- Selecting a consumer panel service; 2002; Sudman, S., Wansink, B.
- Compare and contrast; 2002; Kindig, L.
- Software Review: CAVI from OpinionOne; 2002; Macer, T.
- Supplier Side: Survey programming integration; 2002; Mitrano, M.
- Drawing a few from many; 2002; Fitzgerald, A.
- If given the choice; 2002; Allison, J., O'Konis, C.
- At my own pace in my own place; 2002; Downes-Le Guin, T.
- Privacy, please; 2002; Mack, B.
- My opinion counts; 2002; Solomon, M. B.
- Qualitatively Speaking: Online focus groups...here today, not gone tomorrow; 2002; Yoffie, A. J.
- Net research suffers due to failed promise; 2002; Tortorello, N. J.
- Using phone methods in a digital age; 2002; Fitzgerald, A.
- Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking; 2002; Suh, B., Han, I.
- Subscale distance and item clustering effects in self-administered surveys: A new metric; 2001; Bradlow, E. T., Fitzsimons, G. J.
- When money doesn't talk; 2001; Funk, S., McCallum-Keeler, G.
- Reaching IT professionals: online vs. telephone interviewing; 2001; Van Houten, B.
- A comparison of Internet and mail survey methodologies; 2001; Medlin, B., Whitten, D.